European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 27-33, April 2009

A randomized study with adjuvant mistletoe versus oral Etoposide on post relapse disease-free survival in osteosarcoma patients

  • Alessandra Longhi

      Affiliations

    • Chemotherapy Division, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +390516366374; fax: +390516366277.
  • ,
  • Erminia Mariani

      Affiliations

    • Immunology and Genetics Laboratory, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Jürgen J. Kuehn

      Affiliations

    • Lukas Clinic, Arlesheim, Switzerland

Received 28 December 2008; received in revised form 29 January 2009; accepted 2 February 2009. published online 08 August 2011.

Abstract 

Background

Osteosarcoma is a highly malignant bone tumor affecting mainly adolescents. While it can be cured in approximately 60% of cases with the recommended neoadjuvant chemotherapy, few experimental target drugs are currently available through phases I and II trials for relapsed and inoperable patients. We know from historical controls that the risk to relapse increases after the second relapse. Relapse-free survival then decreases to <20% at 12 months. Oral Etoposide is often used in clinical practice but outside any protocol or evidence of improved survival.

Methods and Materials

Viscum album fermentatum Pini (Viscum) is a highly popular phytocompound across central Europe with immunomodulatory activity. Encouraged by the preliminary findings of a pilot study that showed a prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) of more than 12 months in four of our five osteosarcoma patients after their second relapse, we started a two-arm randomized study comparing Viscum album fermentatum Pini s.c. to oral Etoposide for patients free from disease after their second metastatic relapse. Our aim is to compare the disease-free survival to a historical group of patients at 12 months.

Results

To date, the median follow-up is 9.5 months while the study is in progress. The median DFS is currently 3 months for Etoposide and 8.5 months for Viscum. Patients on Viscum report a higher quality of life due to lower toxicity, compared to Etoposide.

Conclusion

In-depth study of the immunomodulatory mechanisms of Viscum in osteosarcoma patients is required. Viscum shows promise as adjuvant treatment in prolonging DFS after a second relapse, while Etoposide does not seem to prolong the DFS in patients after their second relapse. A larger multi-center trial is required to determine efficacy of therapy in osteosarcoma patients. Preliminary data are reported.

Keywords: Mistletoe, Viscum album, Etoposide, Osteosarcoma, Disease-free survival

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1876-3820(09)00009-2

doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2009.02.005

European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 27-33, April 2009