European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Volume 1, Issue 4 , Page 254, December 2009

Case conference on integrative medicine—Results of an experiment and future perspectives of a new interdisciplinary approach

  • B. Brinkhaus

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • M. Teut

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • M. Girke

      Affiliations

    • Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, Department of Internal Medicine, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • P.F. Matthiesen

      Affiliations

    • Medical University Witten/Herdecke, Witten/Herdecke, Germany
  • ,
  • A. Michalsen

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany
    • Immanuel Hospital, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • H. Heimpel

      Affiliations

    • Medical University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • S.N. Willich

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany

Background and aim

Patients are often faced with a choice between conventional and complementary medicine. The aim of the innovative Case Conference on Integrative Medicine was to explore the interface between conventional and complementary forms of treatment and the potential of integrative approaches.

Methods

An interactive case conference was held in December 2006 in Düsseldorf, Germany. Experts in conventional medicine and complementary medicine (naturopathy, Chinese medicine including acupuncture, homeopathy, and anthroposophical medicine) discussed strategies for diagnosis and treatment based on two case reports on chronic pain diseases (fibromyalgia and irritable bowel syndrome).

Results

Initially, the question of definitions and of the boundaries between conventional and complementary treatment strategies was not successful. The Physicians of different medical fields proposed multimodal treatment concepts including psychosomatic intervention that allowed for the inclusion of adjunctive therapy from either realm of medicine. However, as the focus turned to the patient and his or her complexity as an individual, the different points of view were brought closer together. In this regard, the diversity of perspectives was perceived as a valuable resource for promoting individualization in medical treatment.

Conclusion

The Case Conference on Integrative Medicine should serve as a model for testing similar activities in academic hospitals and establishing such approaches in routine care. This integrative strategy has the potential to improve patient care in medicine.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1876-3820(09)00187-5

doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2009.08.062

European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Volume 1, Issue 4 , Page 254, December 2009