European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Volume 1, Issue 3 , Pages 117-123 , October 2009

Can you trust systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies?

Received 27 July 2009 ,Accepted 3 September 2009.

References 

  1. Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994;309:597–599
  2. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6: e 1000097, doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
  3. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100
  4. Thase ME, Kornstein SG, Germain JM, Jiang Q, Guico-Pabia C, Ninan PT. An integrated analysis of the efficacy of desvenlafaxine compared with placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. CNS Spectr. 2009;14:144–154
  5. Gartlehner G, Gaynes BN, Hansen RA, Thieda P, DeVeaugh-Geiss A, Krebs EE, et al. Comparative benefits and harms of second-generation antidepressants: background paper for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:734–750
  6. Linde K, Berner MM, Kriston L. St John's wort for major depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;8(4):CD000448;Oct
  7. Manheimer E, White A, Berman B, Forys K, Ernst E. Meta-analysis: acupuncture for low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:651–663
  8. Furlan AD, van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, Tsukayama H, Lao L, Koes BW, et al. Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;25(1):CD001351;Jan
  9. Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartey L, Jüni P, Dörig S, Sterne JA, et al. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet. 2005;366:726–732
  10. Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, et al. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet. 1997;350:834–843
  11. Coulter ID. Evidence based complementary and alternative medicine: promises and problems. Forsch Komplementarmed. 2007;14:102–108
  12. Vickers A, Goyal N, Harland R, Rees R. Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:159–166
  13. Wu T, Li Y, Bian Z, Liu G, Moher D. Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized? Trials 2009;210(1):46 Jul
  14. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan AW, Cronin E, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One. 2008;283(8):e3081;Aug
  15. Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:252–260
  16. Zimpel T, Windeler J. Publications of dissertations on unconventional medical therapy and diagnosis procedures--a contribution to “publication bias”. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2000;7:71–74
  17. Lee A, Copas JB, Henmi M, Gin T, Chung RC. Publication bias affected the estimate of postoperative nausea in an acupoint stimulation systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:980–983
  18. Linde K, Willich SN. How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine. J R Soc Med. 2003;96:17–22
  19. Gaster B, Holroyd J. St John's wort for depression. A systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:152–156
  20. Kim HL, Streltzer J, Goebert D. St. John's wort for depression: a meta-analysis of well-defined clinical trials. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1999;187:532–539
  21. Linde K, Mulrow CD. St John's wort for depression (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, issue 3. Oxford: Update Software; 1998.
  22. Volz HP. Controlled clinical trials of Hypericum extracts in depressed patients — an overview. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1997;30(suppl 2):72–76
  23. Williams JW, Mulrow CD, Chiquette E, Noel PH, Aguilar C, Cornell J. A systematic review of newer pharmacotherapies for depression in adults: evidence report summary. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:743–756
  24. Sood A, Knudsen K, Sood R, Wahner-Roedler DL, Barnes SA, Bardia A, et al. Publication bias for CAM trials in the highest impact factor medicine journals is partly due to geographical bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:1123–1126
  25. Moher D, Pham B, Lawson ML, Klassen TP. The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:1–90
  26. Pham B, Klassen TP, Lawson ML, Moher D. Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:769–776
  27. Linde K, Jonas WB, Melchart D, Willich S. The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:526–531
  28. Ernst E. Chiropractic spinal manipulation for whiplash injury? A sysetamtic review of controlled clinical trial. Focus Alternative Complementary Ther. 2009;14:85–86
  29. Kiene H. Komplementäre Methodenlehre der klinischen Forschung. Cognition-based medicine. Berlin: Springer; 2001;
  30. Heusser P. Problems of study designs with randomization, blinding and placebos. Forsch Komplementarmed. 1999;6:89–102
  31. Linde K, Scholz M, Melchart D, Willich SN. Should systematic reviews include non-randomized and uncontrolled studies? The case of acupuncture for chronic headache. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:77–85
  32. Gøtzsche PC, Hróbjartsson A, Maric K, Tendal B. Data extraction errors in meta-analyses that use standardized mean differences. JAMA. 2007;298:430–437
  33. Greenland S. Quality scores are useless and potentially misleading. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:300–301
  34. Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA. 1999;282:1054–1060
  35. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from 〈www.cochrane-handbook.org〉.
  36. van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, Berman B, Lau L, Koes BW. Acupuncture for low back pain (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 1. Oxford: Update Software; 2000.
  37. Smith LA, Oldman AD, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Teasing apart quality and validity in systematic reviews: an example from acupuncture trials in chronic neck and back pain. Pain. 2000;86:119–132
  38. Linde K, Allais G, Brinkhaus B, Manheimer E, Vickers A, White AR. Acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;21(1):CD001218
  39. Feinstein AR. Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:71–79
  40. Chou R, Huffman LH American Pain Society. American College of Physicians. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:492–504
  41. Lawson ML, Pham B, Klassen TP, Moher D. Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:777–784

PII: S1876-3820(09)00202-9

doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2009.09.002

European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Volume 1, Issue 3 , Pages 117-123 , October 2009

Article Tools