European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Volume 1, Issue 4 , Page 173, December 2009

Representation of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in German treatment guidelines — An appraisal

University, Chair for Complementary Medicine, Rostock, Germany

Background

In the German medical care system CAM still seems to be more or less ignored.

Objective

To evaluate the occurrence of CAM in German treatment guidelines and in the 4 national health care guidelines (NHCG).

Design

The treatment guidelines and NHCG published by the Working Groups of the Scientific Medical Societies (www.AWMF.de) between 2004 and 2009 were searched for CAM with respect to occurrence and rating (recommendations: positive, negative, still unclear) in August 2009.

Results

Eighty-eight scientific medical societies have published altogether 728 treatment guidelines. Only 75 guidelines and the NHCGs list any CAM; of these, 9 guidelines and 2 NHCGs mention kinesitherapy, dietetic treatment, relaxation techniques, physical therapy and physiotherapy mainly without supplying further details. In the guidelines and NHCGs altogether 168 CAM measures are validated as positive, 48 as negative and 88 as unclear. Main reasons for the rating “unclear” are low quality or missing clinical trials.

In Germany, CAM methods are subsumed under the generic terms physical medicine and balneotherapy/climate therapy (measures of physical therapy, physiotherapy, balneotherapy and climate therapy) or naturopathy (which includes measures of physical medicine, balneotherapy and climate therapy and several other methods). From the measures of physical therapy, etc., mentioned in the guidelines, 95 are validated as positive, 12 as negative and 22 as unclear. If measures of physical medicine, etc. are excluded, of the remaining naturopathic methods 67 are rated as positive, 40 as negative and 43 as unclear. Alternative methods are rated as positive (n=9), negative (n=6) and unclear (n=13).

Conclusion

The notification of CAM in German medical guidelines increased in the last few years. Also, some naturopathic methods beyond physical medicine are rated as positive. However, CAM is still far from being a substantial part of medical care in Germany.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1876-3820(09)00206-6

doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2009.09.006

European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Volume 1, Issue 4 , Page 173, December 2009